This month the trial of a group of young British
Muslims, including students, on terrorist charges is due to begin at the Old
Bailey, and once again the spotlight will be turned on university campuses as
a possible breeding ground for extremism.
Since they were arrested in Crawley in March
2004 in connection with a potential bomb plot, the atrocity the police and
security forces had been fearing took place on July 7 2005, killing 52 people
and injuring 750 in central London.
Muslim students were loud in denunciation, but in the national soul-searching
that followed the revelation of homegrown suicide bombers with Yorkshire
accents, it is their attitudes that are being scrutinised and it is
Asian-looking students with rucksacks who are most often stopped and searched
at stations.
Claims that groups such as Hizb ut-Tahrir and
al-Muhajiroun are recruiting idealistic students for armed jihad have been
rebutted by universities in detail but are hard to prove or disprove fully.
What is clear is that something very interesting has been happening on UK
campuses over the past couple of years: the arrival of an articulate and
assertive Muslim presence in student politics and student unions.
In universities, this has ranged from
arguments about prayer rooms to furious debates about Israel and the
Palestinians. As more Muslims stand for office and get involved in local
unions, they are making their 300,000-strong presence felt at national level.
This year, for the first time, a Muslim is standing for president of the
National Union of Students.
Would the country at large have woken up to
this without the trauma of July 7? Possibly not, but in the wake of the
bombings, the higher education minister, Bill Rammell, embarked on a series of
meetings with Muslim students around England to gauge the temperature and
listen to their views. Later this month, he will be speaking publicly about
what he learned.
Last week, Rammell was in a packed room at
Newham College in east London at the receiving end of a barrage of questions.
"From the first question people came down on him like a ton of bricks,
but he handled it quite well," said Jabir Adam, 19, who is on an access
course in computing.
It became apparent that resentment was
directed at the media portrayal of Muslims rather than at the government - but
why was the government not doing more to control the press and television?
That's not quite how it works, explained
Rammell, who was heartened by the complete disavowal of Osama Bin Laden by the
Newham students but shocked by the conspiracy theories in circulation, notably
the idea that the 9/11 attacks were the work of the White House.
"It's very worrying when views like that
are put forward," he said. That was in a different bracket to the
widespread hostility to British and American foreign policy, especially in
Iraq. "I disagree with some views but you can have a reasonable debate.
We need to be listening but also challenging when people are saying things
that are simply not true."
Waqar Chaudhary, 18, studying for a BTec
National in business and hoping to go to university, quoted Michael Moore's
film Fahrenheit 9/11 in favour of the conspiracy theory and said he had seen
other videos suggesting involvement by the American government. "We think
the whole thing goes deeper," he said darkly.
But what came across loud and clear was the
resentment of Chaudhary and others at all Muslims being portrayed as
terrorists because of the actions of a "few bad apples". Julie
Grace, 19, who describes herself as half Muslim, half Catholic, countered:
"Muslims are to blame as well; they say they are doing these things in
the name of Islam."
All these students, along with Sikh student
Lovejid Sarkaria, 19, who wants to become a teacher, praised the college's
strict secular policy, under which there is no designated prayer room for any
religion, although students can book rooms as required. This extends to having
no Christmas trees or Diwali lights; the college has winter and spring breaks,
not Christmas and Easter holidays.
Rammell is concerned that unreasonable
demands by some Muslim students at universities - for the complete
reorganisation of exams to accommodate prayers, for instance - are bound to be
rejected and will then be used by extremists as evidence that the authorities
are anti-Muslim. In a multicultural, but predominantly Christian country there
are limits to what the state or educational institutions should do for one
religion, he says, adding: "Unless we have that dialogue, there is a
danger that a chasm grows up between a minority of young Muslims and
society."
At Leicester University, Zakariyya Khan,
president of the Islamic Society, is doing all he can to get Muslims more
involved. A day of fasting in aid of the London bombings relief fund and the
Pakistan earthquake appeal attracted 200 non-Muslims and raised £3,000, he
says. There is no Hizb ut-Tahrir activity on campus, he insists. His friend
Azim Mahomed is standing for vice-president of the Leicester students' union,
a job that includes organising social events, including the boozy ones. Would
he want to ban alcohol? "No, of course not," he laughs.
Wakkas Khan, president of the Federation of
Student Islamic Societies (Fosis), believes that Muslim students have become
more organised and engaged in dialogue. "Our voice is being heard an
awful lot more. I think a lot of the hard work we did prior to July 7 showed
afterwards. What could have happened was a severe backlash."
Paradoxically, anger with the British
government's policies is drawing Muslims into British politics. "Our
opposition to the terror laws and identity cards is very robust but I don't
think in any way it is taking away from our sense of Britishness. They are
making Muslims much more aware of their environment and how they can make
democratic political change," says Khan.
Claims of extremism on 30 campuses made in a
report by Anthony Glees, of Brunel University, were dismissed by most of the
universities concerned and Rammell regards the report as "significantly
overstating" the true position.
Les Ebdon, vice-chancellor of Luton
University, who chaired the working group producing guidelines for
universities on balancing free speech, security and religious sensitivities,
believes academic freedom can only thrive in an atmosphere of respect and
tolerance. "At times of tensions between communities it is essential we
have universities where people can interact like that."
When Cardiff University pulped its student
newspaper within hours of it printing one of the notorious Danish cartoons,
Muslim students knew they were a force to be reckoned with.
Later this month, the first Muslim candidate
for NUS president will appeal for votes. Pav Akhtar, currently NUS national
black student officer, will be hoping for the backing of Muslim delegates, but
he doesn't fit the fundamentalist stereotype. He's gay.